• Loved All My Lies?

  • What If You Lost All Those Fears of Me?

  • Scarecrow Bleeds What No-one Needs

  • More Songs For Swinging Lovers

  • It Comes Clear In Pictures of Here

  • So Much For Love

    Creative Commons License
  • Want To Marry A Personality?

    • 108,807 of them have stopped by here to drink Pernod and dry cider!

The Emperor Has No Clothes

brian_cowen_naked_1

What is freedom of expression? Without the freedom to offend, it ceases to exist.

- Salman Rushdie

No one likes to be the butt of a joke. We all have our egoes and none more so than preening politicians. However, those who would put themselves forward to be the leaders of a free society have to accept that they can be openly and, sometimes nastily, criticised. Moreover, art, and caricature in particular, is an important form of such unfettered protest.

Hence, when some unknown painter casually strolled into both the National Gallery and the RHA Gallery last Saturday and hung up two nude paintings of Brian Cowen, without either being immediately noticed, this was a wonderfully audacious form of public protest and artistic expression. Portrayed either holding up a cheap pair of underpants or squatting on the toilet with loo roll in hand, clearly neither image was ever going to be flattering to a grossly overweight man. Yet, any vulgarity that they contain will prove to be really quite tame in nature compared to what will surely now follow by way of a popular backlash!

brian_cowen_naked_21

For, you see, when RTE (Ireland’s State-owned television station) reported the story in a suitably tasteful manner on Monday’s main evening news, it led to private demands being made of it to withdraw the recording of that segment from the Internet (which it did) and for a public apology for any personal offence caused to Brian Cowen or his family or for any disrespect shown to the office of An Taoiseach to be made (which it also complied with last night). Not only was this a snivelling act of subservience on the part of RTE, it highlighted once more just how much influence is exercised by Fianna Fail over the nation’s largest media outlet. Worse, no matter how trivial it may seem, this suppression of a legitimate news story about a public figure damages the freedom of the media and, by extension, the freedom of each citizen of this country.

My initial reaction was to feel anger once more at the arrogance of Fianna Fail. From Charlie Haughey to Ray Burke to Liam Lawlor, they have abused their office shamelessly. The previous Taoiseach could only lamely justify large amounts of unexplained cash in his bank account with the explanation that he had won it in the bookies, m’lud. On top of this, their ridiculous fuelling of this country’s economy by way of  recklessly promoting an enormous private propety boom has brought this country’s economy to its knees now that a global recession is upon us. Yet, let the story of how one ordinary citizen cocked a snoop at them be reported upon nationally and they are leaning heavily on RTE to try and kill it off.

obama-new-yorker

Last year, The New Yorker caused a huge stir when they published a contraversial image on their front cover (above) of what Barack Obama getting into the Oval Office might mean for the country. They claimed that the then-Democratic nominee was not the target of their satire, rather the Republican demonising of him. Yet, the Obama campaign was rightly upset about it, as they knew well that many voters would not draw this distinction and that this was therefore a dangerous light for their candidate to be portrayed in. Accordingly, the campaign and its supporters were very vocal in their complaints, as they were fully entitled to be. Yet the magazine edition stayed on the shelves and Obama’s people simply had to carry on with the business of getting their man elected as best they could.

That is what happens in free societies. Just do not mention “swift boats” to John Kerry…

john-major

However, upon further reflection, the ghost of another politician came whispering to my mind. The popular image of Prime Minister John Major became that of the Spitting Image puppet that showed him wearing his underpants outside of his trousers. Soon, other cartoonists (such as Steve Bell above) would adopt the same image in their caricatures of him. Of course, the image, by itself, did not cause the near wipeout of Major’s government in the 1997 general election. Rather, it captured the zeitgeist and therefore became a powerful symbol of a tired government that was out of time, out of touch, and soon to be out of power.

Accordingly, it is more disappointing than surprising that Brian Cowen or his cohorts in the Fianna Fail party are foolishly trying to clamp down on the reporting of this satire. The reality is that they have failed this country badly with their irresponsible policies and lack of true leadership, they are running the gauntlet of the mother of all electoral hidings, they know this only too well, and are shrewd enough to see how images such as these can now so easily push them into political oblivion. In short, their cowardly pressurising of  RTE is the act of people petrified with fear for their ability to cling on to power and who are desperately resorting to bully-boy tactics as a result.

Hence, in a perverse way, I am delighted that they have lashed out in this short-sighted manner. The combination of the St. Patrick’s Day festivities and last weekend’s amazing sporting successes had soothed the national anger to an extent. Thanks to this act of folly, though, they have stirred the hornets’ nest right up again. This party has done untold damage to this country, so it is a pleasure to see them now doing untold damage to themselves.

Brian Cowen, as you ponder upon the pot, do not ask for whom the toilet flushes. It flushes for thee.

8 Responses

  1. good post. although I’m worried that I’m seeing most of the reaction to this online – perhaps illustrating the fading relevance of traditional media.

    I’m quite offended by RTE’s apology, especially as it seems to be on the basis of a few viewer complaints (armchair moralists have an insidious effect on public broadcasting) and the complaint of the Taoiseach’s press office, which points to the blurring of a line (ironically, given the nature of the issue) between the office and the person of the Taoiseach – if he was personally offended, he should have made a personal complaint. A liberal democracy has no place for officially protecting the dignity of its political leaders.

    anyway, ‘#picturegate’ was the no. 1 trend on Twitter (worldwide, as far as I know!) for a while today. I made my contribution to publicising this in the social media/information dissemination networks today: http://hardcorefornerds.tumblr.com/post/89668528

  2. [...] | Media Lens Message Board here and here | New York Times | Niall O’Loughlin | Nick Fegan | No ordinary fool | Northern Notes | Over the Bridge | Paddy Power | p45.net | Reimann’s Cut | RTÉ here and [...]

  3. Thanks Gabba. I think what this does demonstrate is the ability of social/online media to react more quickly to events. This also allows them to set the tone and the agenda to a certain extent.

    I was taken by your “armchair moralists” point, as many people have since complained by email about the apology being made. Therefore, while I think that you have a point, why is it one-way traffic in terms of which complaints are paid attention to?

    If this was the BBC, they would have a producer or two writing about this online, in an effort to explain how they work and what they wish to achieve. Transparency, Ireland, good luck with that, etc.

  4. [...] New York Times | Niall O’Loughlin | Nick Fegan | No ordinary fool | Not good for my age | Northern [...]

  5. I think it can be easier for broadcasters to react to people calling for pieces to be taken off the air rather than keeping them up… at least if that’s what you mean by one way traffic. Personally, though, I would argue that decisions to report should err on the side of bad taste rather than censorship.

    as for traditional media, I found a new article on the Irish Times website just after I posted my comment here last night (the same on as was published in today’s print edition). There was an important – if not, ultimately, hugely significant – clarification about who made the Government complaint, and more saliently, that management had already made the decision to broadcast.

    neither of those points were much evident elsewhere online, and I think the ‘tone’ of which you refer was at times overly reactionary.

  6. decision NOT to REbroadcast – sorry, could seriously have done with a proofreader there!

  7. 1) I think that you are right with your first point, taking things like watershed into account where appropriate. I was also being a little tongue-in-cheek with the question, as I had been wondering if the armchair might be occupied by a FF mover-and-shaker!

    2) If you notice, I tried to be careful in how I phrased my article in respect of who said what, but knowing that
    someone had said something!

    Some other things occurred to me when I too read that denial. Firstly, why is it always a civil servant who had not bring the report to the Minister’s attention or a PR official on a solo run whenever FF is caught out?

    Secondly, taking the RTE remark at face value, I cannot help but be concerned by the sinister suggestion that this may have been a Pavlov’s dog reaction on their part – do not diss FF, they are in power nearly all of the time.

    Equally, if RTE did take the decision themselves, why not publish an apology right away online and why not have an online explanation as to why certain decisions do get taken? In trying to gloss over what happened on Monday/Tuesday. their response raises further important questions of public interest .

    Finally, if FF only protested, why do it privately and therefore opaquely? That is the stuff of smoke and daggers! See my point on the Obama campaign above.

    3) There will always be OTT reaction on some blogs. It is the “notice me, notice me” mentality that will always feature in a cluttered space. (That said, I have used deliberately OTT remarks in the past to make a point and which had nothing to do with getting any more attention for that post above others).

    There was equally plenty of moderate opinion too over the past couple of days and some who offered up contrary points to what the herd came up with.

  8. [...] in March, there was remarkable uproar online over Cowengate and what it might signify for our right to freedom of expression. The scale of this reaction is [...]

Leave a Reply